|
Net
Current Asset Value according to Ben Graham (NCAV)
Finding low-risk stocks should be priority number one in the stock market.
Benjamin Graham, considered by many to be the architect of fundamental
analysis, described a strategy for identifying deep value stocks, which in his
view are low-risk candidates, in his book,
"The Intelligent Investor,"
published in 1949.
Graham’s strategy, dubbed the “net current asset value” approach, apparently
works very well. One research study, covering the years 1970 through 1983 showed
that portfolios picked at the beginning of each year, and held for one year,
returned 29.4 percent, on average, over the 13-year period, compared to 11.5
percent for the S&P 500 Index. Other studies of Graham’s strategy produced
similar results.
Despite the impressive results, Graham’s net current asset value (NCAV)
approach is relatively unknown to individual investors. That’s probably because
finding stocks meeting Graham’s requirements requires some digging.
That’s why we dug ourselves into
this matter and took this method “for a spin”.
In a normal computation of a company’s book value is
defined as "
Total Assets minus Total Liabilities"
Ben Graham had a different view about this statement.
NCAV = Current assets (cash, inventories and accounts receivable) – Total
Liabilities
Graham’s NCAV strategy calls for buying stocks trading at two-thirds or less
of their net current asset value. Or in our screener a NCAV -ratio
> 1,33. ( As we define the ratio as Current Assets / Market Value)
This ratio is used to identify those companies that are priced less than their
net current assets
The ratios are been sorted in our screener in a descending order. Next,
you can also refine the selection by ordering the selection by MF rank , Free
Cash flow ,etc..
That’s a stringent requirement, since most companies have negative NCAVs. But
Graham was looking for firms trading so cheap that there was little danger of
falling further. His strategy calls for selling when a firm’s share price trades
up to its NCAV.
But of course , one is free to chose the "Margin of Safety. you want or
desire...
Go to the Benjamin Graham NCAV Stock
Screener
NCAV
Graham concluded that stocks selling below NCAV were worth more dead than alive.
Justifying the selling of stock at below NCAV is often done on the basis that a
company has no intention of liquidating. Graham stated if a stock was selling
below liquidating value, either the price is too low or it should be liquidated.
An investor should draw two conclusions from this:
1. At a price below liquidating value, stockholders should question whether it
makes sense to continue as a going concern
2. Management should take all steps necessary to correct the gap between market
price and intrinsic value (liquidating value) and justify to shareholders their
reasons to continue the business
There are no sound reasons for a company to be selling below its liquidation
value. For a stock to arrive at a price below NCAV, the company is not likely to
have a satisfactory trend in earnings. The risk in purchasing stocks below NCAV
is that the assets may be dissipated to a point where the intrinsic value is no
longer above the price paid. This does happen but Graham suggested looking for
the following potential developments:
1. Creation of an earning power commensurate with the assets caused by a general
improvement in the industry or a favorable change in operating policies
2. A sale or merger
3. Complete or partial liquidation
Graham goes on to offer several examples. When buying stocks below NCAV, an
investor should lean towards companies with a fairly imminent prospect of the
developments listed above. Stocks that have been dissipating assets quickly and
so no signs of changing should be avoided.
Graham then states that investment bargains are common stocks that are:
1. selling below liquid asset values or NCAV
2. in no danger of dissipating these assets
3. have formerly shown a large earning power on the market price
Finally, Graham says it better than I ever could:
They are indubitably worth considerably more than they are selling for, and
there is a reasonably good chance that this greater worth will sooner or later
reflect itself in the market price. At their low price these bargain stocks
actually enjoy a high degree of safety, meaning by safety a relatively small
risk of principal.
|